This is absolutely insane. Former President Obama did a lot of things that had people scratching their heads but this could be the most unconscionable. Obama handed hundreds of thousands of dollars to The Nation of Islam, led by Rev. Louis Farrakhan. And what was that cash used for? It was specifically earmarked to be […]
By Dahr Jamail
Global Research, December 15, 2018
Truthout 21 March 2016
(Of relevance to current developments, this article was first published by Truthout and posted on Global Research in March 2016)
Humans generate more than 300 million tons of plastic annually — an amount equal to the combined body weight of the entire global adult human population — and nearly half of the plastic is only used one time before it is tossed away to eventually find its way to the oceans. So it should come as little surprise that by 2050, it is a virtual certainty that every seabird on the planet will have plastic in its stomach.
Recent estimates indicate that upwards of 8 million tons of plastic are added to the planet’s oceans every year, the equivalent of a dump truck full of plastic every minute. That is enough plastic to have led one scientist to estimate that people who consume average amounts of seafood are ingesting approximately 11,000 particles of plastic every year.
The earth’s oceans will have more plastic than fish by 2050, according to a January report published by the World Economic Forum.
Experts with whom Truthout spoke on the topic confirmed that these trends are likely to continue. Biological oceanographer Dr. Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez, with the National Oceanography Centre at Britain’s University of Southampton, is very concerned about public indifference to the urgency of the situation.
“Marine pollution is a big issue,” Iglesias-Rodriguez told Truthout.
“There is this idea that oceans have unlimited inertia, but nanoparticles of plastic getting into marine animals and the food chain are affecting fish fertility rates, and this affects food security and coastal populations. Pollution is having a huge impact on the oceans and is urgent and needs to be dealt with.”
Photo: Plastic Bag via Shutterstock; Edited: LW / TO
In the North Pacific Ocean, there exists what has become known as the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch,” a phenomenon scientists know as the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre.
Miriam Goldstein, a researcher at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego, warned Truthout that by adding massive amounts of plastic into the oceans, humans are causing large-scale change to the oceans’ entire ecological system.
Goldstein is the lead author of a study that revealed just how deeply into the oceanic ecosystem plastic has already embedded itself.
“We found eggs on the pieces of plastic, and these were sea skater [insect] eggs,” Goldstein said. “Sea skaters naturally occur in the gyre and are known to lay their eggs on floating objects. So we found that the amount of eggs being laid had increased with the amount of plastic.”
The North Pacific Subtropical Gyre’s eastern section, located between Hawai’i and California, is estimated to be about twice the size of Texas. According to Goldstein, this vast “garbage patch” contains an “alarming amount” of plastic garbage, the majority of which is comprised of very small-size pieces.
Goldstein’s study shows how the immense amount of plastic is creating consequences for animals across the marine food web.
Another Scripps study shows that nearly 10 percent of the fish collected during a trip to the gyre had plastic waste in their stomachs.
Published in Marine Ecology Progress Series, the aforementioned study (authored by Peter Davison and Rebecca Asch) estimates that fish at intermediate ocean depths in the North Pacific Ocean could be ingesting plastic at the staggering rate of 12,000 to 24,000 tons per year.
Yet plastic will not likely be going away anytime soon. The use of plastic bags around the world has increased by 20 times in the last 50 years. One-third of all plastic packaging then escapes collection systems, and a large percentage of that plastic eventually ends up in the oceans, according to the World Economic Forum report.
Only 5 percent of plastics are effectively recycled, and the production of plastics is expected to increase by at least 1.12 billion tons by 2050.
“Our work shows there could be potential effects to the ocean ecosystem that we can’t expect or predict,” Goldstein said.
“There are five subtropical gyres, one in each ocean basin, and they are natural currents. They are vast areas of the oceans; together they comprise the majority of the area of the oceans. So altering them on a large scale could have unexpected results on all kinds of things.”
The amount of plastic floating in the Pacific Gyre has increased 100-fold in the past four decades. Meanwhile, phytoplankton counts are dropping, overfishing is causing dramatic decreases in fish populations, decreasing ocean salinity is intensifying weather extremes, and warming oceans are speeding up melting in Greenland, the Arctic and in Antarctica.
One warning of humanity’s increasingly deleterious impact on the oceans comes from prominent marine biologist Jeremy Jackson of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. In an article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Jackson emphasizes that, without profound and prompt changes in human behavior, we will cause a “mass extinction in the oceans with unknown ecological and evolutionary consequences.”
The statement might sound extreme, until one considers the extent to which we impact the oceans, whether we realize it or not. As science journalist Alanna Mitchell has written about the oceans:
“Every tear you cry … ends up back in the ocean system. Every third molecule of carbon dioxide you exhale is absorbed into the ocean. Every second breath you take comes from the oxygen produced by plankton.”
Dr. Wallace J. Nichols, a research associate at the California Academy of Sciences, told Truthout he finds plastic on every beach he visits across the globe, and added, “Probably every sea turtle on the planet interacts with plastic at some point in its life.”
Not only is Nichols intimately familiar with the pollution crisis plastic poses to the oceans, but also he is well acquainted with the oceanic destruction already underway due to anthropogenic climate disruption (ACD).
He describes sea turtles as a “poster species” for the impacts of ACD: He said their eggs
“are literally cooking on beaches now because the temperatures have moved out of the tolerable range.”
“You often see the polar bear used as the poster species for climate change, but I think sea turtles are just as good of a poster species because they are everywhere and they are already being impacted as the ocean warms,”
In addition to ACD and plastic, he notes that we are introducing too much pollution into the oceans, and taking too much out of them by way of overfishing.
“We’re putting too much in, in all forms of pollution; we’re taking too much out by fishing, overfishing and bycatch; and we’re destroying the edge of the ocean, the places where there is the most biodiversity, reefs, mangroves, seagrass etc.,” he said. “Those are the three big buckets…. Almost every threat to the ocean falls into one of those. We need to put less in, take less out and protect the edges by making some of them off limits to human activity.”
Nichols is deeply concerned by the pace at which negative changes are occurring across the oceans. He said that every time scientists have attempted to predict future scenarios, the pace seems to only quicken.
According to Nichols, despite scientists’ ongoing attempts to adjust their models to keep up with the quickening of feedback loops and other issues, we are still unable to keep pace with the dramatic changes.
He believes “the clock in many ways has already run out,” due to the fact that we are still increasing our use of fossil fuels, while continuing to generate so much plastic and pollution. Nichols says he is frustrated by the fact that despite there being more conversation about these issues now than ever before, that dialogue is still not translating into societal change or evolution.
Truthout asked Nichols if he sees the future becoming worse for the oceans.
“We’re living in it now, from a climate change/fisheries/pollution/habitat destruction point of view, our nightmare is here; it’s the world we live in,” he said. “You see it everywhere now, the collapsing fisheries, the changes in the Arctic and the hardships communities that live there are having to face, the frequency and intensity of storms — everything we imagined 40 years ago when the environmental movement was born, we’re dealing with those now.”
Nichols concluded by describing three possible oceans. Ocean 1.0 is the pristine natural ocean, while Ocean 2.0 is the ocean we have now, which is a result of having, as he described it, lived under “the petroleum product regime.”
“Ocean 3.0 is the future ocean, and it can either be a dead ocean, or we can really come up with some very innovative solutions that right now people aren’t even talking about,” he said.
To Nichols, a positive vision of Ocean 3.0 would entail new ways of getting food from the ocean that don’t involve long lines and bottom trawling, both extremely destructive ways to fish commercially.
It would involve a whole new way of thinking about our packaging and a zero-waste approach to consumer goods, which, he believes, is all possible — if we can muster the political and personal motivation.
“We could have a healthy ocean in 50 years if we make some bold moves,” he said. Those moves would need to include “a cleaner, more responsible set of actions for how we get energy from the ocean and how we use them as a source of food.”
Without those actions happening en masse, Nichols fears we are headed for the “dead ocean” version of our future.
“The dire predictions — they are already here in many, many ways,” he said.
Corrections: Miriam Goldstein was originally attributed the statement of her study having “dire” consequences, which was inaccurately attributed, and hence corrected. Goldstein’s quotes were in close proximity of the sentence, “Not only is it leading to early deaths of animals that ingest it, but also humans then ingesting fish with plastic in their systems are at increased risk of cancer and other health issues.” Please note that this information is not in any way intended to be attributed to Goldstein’s research.
How Ocean Pollution Affects Human Health
Copyright, Truthout. Reprinted with permission.
Dahr Jamail, a Truthout staff reporter, is the author of The Will to Resist: Soldiers Who Refuse to Fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, (Haymarket Books, 2009), and Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches From an Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq, (Haymarket Books, 2007). Jamail reported from Iraq for more than a year, as well as from Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Turkey over the last ten years, and has won the Martha Gellhorn Award for Investigative Journalism, among other awards.
His third book, The Mass Destruction of Iraq: Why It Is Happening, and Who Is Responsible, co-written with William Rivers Pitt, is available now on Amazon. He lives and works in Washington State.
The original source of this article is Truthout
Copyright © Dahr Jamail, Truthout, 2018
Deep Sea Creature That Inspired the Alien Series
The fully transparent Phronima can be deadly to creatures much bigger in size. It can position itself in the belly of the host, which include numerous sea animals. Sounds familiar?
Phronima can be located at the depth of over 1000 feet (305 m) in a rather inhospitable, dark and cold deep sea environment.
To sum it all up, one look at this creature makes the link with the Alien series more than obvious. Therefore, check out some Phronima images below.
Sunday 25 November 2018
‘Aliens have landed’: Hundreds of parasites wash up off coast
Grim: The parasite – far left – eats jellyfish from the inside and rides around in their corpse. Photo: Domnick Walsh
November 23 2018 2:30 AM
Hundreds of parasite creatures which were the inspiration for the film ‘Alien’ have washed up off the Co Kerry coast.
A string of the eerie-looking parasites called Phronima – which bear an uncanny resemblance to the alien queen in the iconic movies – have been found on Ventry Beach outside Dingle.
The creatures – which eat barrel jellyfish from the inside out and ride around in their corpse – are an extremely rare find in Ireland.
The director of Dingle Oceanworld Kevin Flannery said: “Then the female lays her eggs inside in the poor barrel jellyfish.”
He quipped that it is very timely find as pilots spotted strange objects flying close to their planes last Friday.
“So, I’m saying the aliens have landed”, he joked.
Hollywood Ramps Up Anti-Gun Propaganda
By John Caile // 11/16/2018
By now, no reasonable person can deny the overwhelming bias in our mainstream news sources. When some shooting occurs, the first questions directed to law enforcement officials at the news conference are seldom about the perpetrator. Instead, it’s, “What kind of gun did they use? Where did they get the gun? Was it an ‘assault rifle?’” In other words, it’s all about the gun.
Conversely, when it comes to cases when armed civilians successfully defend themselves or others, guns are either left out of the story or their role is downplayed dramatically.
However, the media is only the tip of the propaganda iceberg — and not even the most influential in shaping public opinion. In reality, entertainment programming, whether TV, movies or even “original content” streamed on your various devices, has become the primary vehicle for anti-gun propaganda. And it is very effective.
For example, think about the number of times you see fully automatic weapons used in shows based on law enforcement. Whether the protagonists are street cops, FBI or undercover narcotics agents, the bad guys are invariably armed with full-auto AKs, ARs and even high-end guns like FN SCARs and H&K MP5 submachine guns.
But ask any working police officers (even those in major cities) how many times they actually run into such weapons. The answers run from “Never in my 20 years on the force” to “Once, back in the ‘80s, during the Florida cocaine wars” to “The L.A. bank robbery in ’97.” Other than that, full-autos are almost non-existent in street crime.
Unfortunately, reality matters little. Images of bad guys blazing away in show after show become embedded in the brains of everyone watching. Over time, the perception attains a life of its own. Thus, when anti-gun politicians mention “assault weapons” bans, a disturbing number of otherwise logical people think they’re talking about “you know, those machine guns.” Both politicians and the media continue to encourage this misunderstanding.
Note that these are not attempts to entertain but to persuade.
In a recent episode of one of those “doctor” shows, the main character is being interviewed by a reporter on the shooting by police of two young boys.
The “doc” somberly states that he “knows what hollow-point bullets can do,” which, according to him, is “expand to THREE TIMES their diameter” and “turn muscle tissue into jelly” (I’m not making this up), then “shatter bones like matchsticks.” And he doesn’t stop there. He goes on to claim that the reason that the two boys were shot with a single bullet was that these same hollow-points were able to “easily rip through both victims.”
Such exaggerated nonsense is just that to most of us — nonsense. But you and I are not the intended target — the gullible public is.
Make no mistake, Hollywood’s war on guns is only going to get worse. The anti-gun money poured into this latest election should serve as a warning. In 2020, Bloomberg, Soros and the rest of the usual suspects will be spending even more.
We all need to be aware of the incredible surge in anti-Second-Amendment propaganda masquerading as “entertainment.” And be prepared to challenge politicians who attempt to capitalize on an ignorant and misinformed public.
Here is one opinion on what is happening:
Hillary’s Chinagate: gave China the Right to Foreclose on US homes?
(or just take them, with weapons: bio and other, like DEW)?
US Gives China Eminent Domain Over US Property
Beyond High Treason A. True Ott, PhD, ND
Dot #7 December 2005: The Chinese Defense Minister, Chi Haotiaon delivers a speech to the Chinese military leaders outlining the inevitable “expansion” of China into Canada, the U.S., and Australia — He justifies this because of Chinese racial “superiority” and thus “emminent domain”.
To accomplish this, American would first have to be “Cleansed” by means of a powerful “biological weapon” — causing 150 -200 MILLION AMERICAN DEATHS!!!
Dot #8 March 13, 2008: A secret meeting is conducted for the U.S. House and Senate.
Agents of the Club of Rome give a preview of upcoming events to elected officials who first swear an oath of secrecy.
The traitors are briefed that the economy will begin its collapse in October, 2008.
Congress was told of the real possibility of massive civil unrest and even Civil War being waged.
Detention camps constructed to imprison civil ‘agitators’.
See http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/34877 for the complete meeting agenda.
Dot #13 China agrees to continue investing in U.S. Treasury Bills only after securing the right of “eminent domain” to physically repossess foreclosed American PRIVATE PROPERTY. This move is the equivalent of an unconditional surrender following a bloody war.
This also gives the Chinese military the LEGAL RIGHT to use biological weaponry to “Clean up America all at once”.
It gives them the legal right to use deadly force in removing trespassing Americans from occupying Chinese real estate.
——– Forwarded Message ——–
Subject: SoCal Fire started on Santa Susana Nuclear Test Site, then DEW?
Breaking: Source of Malibu Fire
Contaminated Santa Susana Nuke Facility,
Site of Secret 1959 Meltdown
San Onofre ex-NuclearPowerPlant and Santa Susana Nuclear Test Site both Toxic
(But they don’t want to talk about it)
Babiarz believes the San Onofre plant is a ticking time bomb.
“It’s still very prevalent to me that this not only could happen, but it has happened at Three Mile Island, of course it has happened at Chernobyl,
it’s happened at Fukushima — and lest we forget, it could happen at San Onofre,” she said.
A report filed with the California Public Utilities Commission by Southern California. Edison states that the “Chatsworth substation” suffered an outage at 2:22 pm Thursday, two minutes before the Woolsey fire is reported to have begun. The Chatsworth substation is located “within the larger Boeing Rocketdyne Santa Susana complex,” according to a CPUC document (see bottom of page C-15 or page 17 of the pdf.) The electrical substation (marked with a pin in the photo above and a circle in the photos below, and enlarged in the last photo) is a few hundred yards to the west of where the fire is shown in the Thursday aerial photo as starting, and a few hundred yards to the east of the SRE complex, where the reactor suffered its accident. The substation had been built in part to provide electricity from the reactor, which was the first reactor to produce commercial electricity for the commercial grid, before it became the first such commercial reactor to suffer a partial meltdown.
Chatsworth substation, between apparent site of start of fire to the right and location of SRE reactor partial meltdown to the left.
“Though we must wait for fire authorities to conclude their investigation, it is ironic that an electrical substation built for a reactor that melted down six decades ago now may now be associated with a catastrophic fire that began on the SSFL site that is still badly contaminated from that accident and numerous other spills and releases,” said Denise Duffield, Associate Director of Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles (PSR-LA.)
Cal Fire maps indicate that much of SSFL is within the fire boundaries.
Decades of nuclear and rocket-engine testing activity, including nuclear reactor accidents and other toxic spills and releases, have resulted in widespread contamination throughout SSFL’s 2,850 acre facility. Federally-funded studies indicate higher cancer incidents associated with proximity to the site. The California Dept. of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), which has regulatory oversight over the parties responsible for cleaning up the contamination – the Dept. of Energy, NASA, and the Boeing Company – signed legally binding agreements to fully cleanup the contamination by 2017. However, the cleanup has not even begun and DTSC is considering vastly weaker cleanup plans. “If DTSC and those responsible for polluting SSFL had not broken their cleanup commitments, we wouldn’t be facing the prospect of contamination now being driven off site by the fire,” said Duffield..
“The Woolsey Fire likely released and spread radiological and chemical contamination that was in SSFL’s soil and vegetation via smoke and ash,” said Dr. Bob Dodge, President of Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles. “All wildfire smoke can be hazardous to health, but if SSFL had been cleaned up long ago as DTSC promised, we’d at least not have to worry about exposure to dangerous radionuclides and chemicals as well.”
A statement released by DTSC approximately 10 hours after the fire began said the agency doesn’t believe the fire caused the release of hazardous substances. Mohsen Nazemi, Deputy Director for DTSC’s Brownfields & Environmental Restoration Program, participated in a community meeting Sunday night in Woodland Hills, repeating the same unfounded denials and leaving without taking questions.
“We’ve learned not to trust anything DTSC says, so we’re demanding independent testing and air monitoring for radiation and chemicals from SSFL,” said Melissa Bumstead, a West HIlls resident whose daughter has twice survived leukemia that she believes was caused by SSFL. Bumstead’s Change.org petition urging that SSFL cleanup commitments be upheld has been signed by over 430,000 people. “DTSC has made one broken promise after another, and it wasn’t truthful about SSFL’s contamination long before the fire started.” said Bumstead. “Why would we believe DTSC’s statement that the fire caused no additional risk, when they know they’re the ones responsible for SSFL still being contaminated in the first place?”
Marie Mason, Simi Valley resident and co-founder of the Rocketdyne Cleanup Coalition, agrees. “We’re outraged that after all these years, decades of foot-dragging by DTSC, an agency that is captured by polluters, may have resulted in even more toxic exposures. We’ve always worried about a fire at SSFL, and now a massive wildfire has started on site itself. SSFL could have and should have been cleaned up a long time ago.”
PSR-LA’s Duffield said, “While we must await the final investigation of the cause of the fire, the presently available evidence indicates it appears to have begun on the Santa Susana Field Lab, and the failure to clean it up has significantly increased risks to the public nearby.”
# # #
Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles (PSR-LA) is the largest chapter of the national organization Physicians for Social Responsibility and has worked for the full cleanup of SSFL for over 30 years.. PSR-LA advocates for policies and practices that protect public health from nuclear and environmental threats and eliminate health disparities.
Parents vs. SSFL is a grassroots group of concerned parents and residents who demand compliance with cleanup agreements signed in 2010 that require a full cleanup of all radioactive and chemical contamination at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory.
The Rocketdyne Cleanup Coalition, or RCC, is a community-based alliance dedicated to the cleanup of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL), commonly known as Rocketdyne.
NOTE: We are demanding independent post-fire testing and air monitoring for radiation and chemicals from SSFL. Given the extent of SSFL’s contamination, precautions recommended by fire authorities, such as limiting outdoor activities and using N95 face masks in smokey areas, are especially important.
Sign up for our mailing list and keep up to date with our action alerts and newsletter
Subscribe Get social with PSR-LA! Follow us on twitter, facebook, and youtube
Follow PSR-LA on FacebookFollow PSR-LA on TwitterFollow PSR-LA on YouTube Learn more about the different ways to give
Physicians for Social
617 South Olive St, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Edison refused to answer any of RT’s questions.
On its website, however, the company says they are “being proactive in seeking out options for the relocation of the fuel, including an off-site facility.”
But San Onofre is not the only nuclear site causing concern to scientists and environmentalists in California.
The Santa Susana Field Laboratory — a highly classified former nuclear testing site,
which was the location of the worst nuclear meltdown in nuclear history — was scorched in the California wildfires.
During the 1959 disaster,
459 times more radiation was leaked there than during the infamous 1979 Three Mile Island meltdown in Pennsylvania.
Physicians for Social Responsibility say that the toxic materials in the soil and vegetation could become airborne in smoke and ash.
More than half a million people live within 10 miles of the area.
Investigative journalist Paul DeRienzo told RT that given the site’s classified status, it’s no surprise that Americans don’t know much about the place.
“It was a tremendous accident [in 1959] that gave off more radiation than Three Mile Island did — and other than that, very little is known.
It’s a highly classified site and whatever we learn about it, we learn in dribs and drabs over a long period of time,” DeRienzo said.
Asked whether government assurances that the site is safe could be believed, DeRienzo warned against trusting official guarantees.
“You can’t, because it’s classified, because a lot of the things that happened at Santa Susana were classified and
therefore there are things that they’re just never going to tell you and only accidentally does it come out,” he said.
Malibu Fire started at Santa Susana, then intensified by DEW
On 11/14/2018 10:06 AM, Jim wrote:
> Fires from DEW – Directed Energy Weapons – more evidence:
> Houses burnt to ash, but plants next to them still green, steel beams warped on bridge?
> On 11/12/2018 9:11 PM, Jim wrote:
>> The Nuclear Test Facility near Thousand Oaks on Fire => Nuclear Ash up into Air
>> Santa Susana Field Laboratories never cleaned up – toxic nuclear waste now up into Air
>> Woolsey Fire Burns Nuclear Meltdown Site that State Toxics Agency Failed to Clean Up
>> 50 Kids with Cancer living near the area – now burning up and nuclear ash is going up.
>> Stay indoors and wash off any ash
I Have been reviewing a LOT of pictures of the Woolsey fire in Southern California. There are a lot of questionable things I see. Many houses are nothing but literal ash, yet green lawns, trees, plastic garbage cans, other things effected by heat are still there. Just the structures and vehicles have been utterly destroyed.
I have posted a video of a bridge in the Woolsey fire area. NOTE the green trees all around the bridge, water flowing under the bridge yet there is a gigantic hole in the middle of the bridge with burn out tar and the metal beams warped.
If this is fire, then why isn’t anything else burnt around it? I believe that this is evidences of a D.E.W.
>> ——– Forwarded Message ——–
>> Subject: Weather Warfare on America? Hurricanes, Fires created by Directed Energy?
>> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:20:45 -0800
>> Weather Warfare on America? Hurricanes, Fires created by Directed Energy?
>> California Fires Created to Distract from Voter Fraud???
>> The “camp fire” in California, like the Sebastopoll and Santa Rosa wildfires that came before it
>> appears to have the hallmarks of something far more sinister than what is being reported by the mainstream media.
>> Q is right, the enemy is at the front door and UN Agenda 21 is but one of his deadly weapons.
>> PG&E caused Fire in N. CA?
>> Rothschild head of PG&E = http://www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us/corporate-governance/corporation-directors/roger-kimmel.page
>> Directed Energy Creating Fires in California?:
>> ——– Forwarded Message ——–
>> Subject: Weather Warfare on America? Hurricanes, Fires created by Directed Energy?
>> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:44:24 -0800
>> Is there Weather Warfare on the American People?
>> Hurricanes, Fires created by Directed Energy?
>> California Gets Cooked – Hurricanes Harvey, etc Directed by HAARP?
>> Fires Created by Microwave Directed Energy Weapon
>> California Firestorms: Geoengineered Catastrophe
>> Yet another round of extreme firestorm catastrophes are hitting California.
>> Like the recent Santa Rosa fire disaster, the current wildfires are verifiably connected to conditions created by the ongoing global climate engineering assault.
>> The geoengineering cabal is becoming more desperate by the day as the biosphere and climate unraveling accelerates exponentially.
>> The 6 minute video below reveals aspects of the climate engineering assault and its connection to the California firestorms.
>> The “CO2 Climate Change” BS is being proven wrong, so the desperate Elite have to create the Problems directly.
>> Why were surrounding trees unburned, but houses demolished???
>> Why 16 Fires started Simultaneously in N CA mostly on Marijuana Farm Areas?
>> Why did TREES Burn from Inside Out like with Directed Energy from Lightning-Like Sources?
>> Why did Blue Sparks come from the Sky, with no Lightning?
>> The United States is deploying a new generation of weapons that discharge light-wave energy, the same spectrum of energy found in your microwave, or in your TV remote control. They’re called “directed-energy weapons”. Lasers, high-powered microwaves, and particle beams. They claim that this technology is new and that first directed energy weapons are being tested right now, but the fact is that advanced technology is always suppressed from the general public. What is Directed Energy? How do direct energy weapons work? What can these direct energy weapons do?
>> The US Government Has Experimented With Controlling Hurricanes
>> Origins of Weather Warfare,Hurricane Nate,
>> Apocalyptic California Wildfires was microwaved mirrored to 9/11 through GeoEngineering
>> FIRE storms, BLUE Lights in sky – 60 CA wildfires OUT OF NOWHERE – DIRECTED ENERGY?
>> Fire Storms [geoengineered] in California
>> BLUE SPARKS in skies-Sudden Winds out of NOWHERE
>> ——– Forwarded Message ——–
>> Subject: North California Fires were Pot Farms lit by Mexican Drug Cartels
>> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:03:19 -0700
>> From: Jim
>> North California Fires were Pot Farms lit by Mexican Drug Cartels
>> Destroying CA Competition to Mexican Drug Cartels
>> BURN THE COMPETITION!
>> Pot farming is a big industry in California – And now it’s up in smoke!
>> The pot farms are going up in smoke.
>> CNN Money reported:
>> Deadly wildfires in Northern California are burning up marijuana farms in the so-called Emerald Triangle.
>> Blazes have destroyed a number of farms in Mendocino County right before legal recreational sales begin in California.
>> Law enforcement authorities
>> – including senior Department of Homeland Security officials
>> – and key people within the legal marijuana business quickly
>> noticed that the areas hit hardest by the fires are the same places
>> that California’s marijuana industry legally grows cannabis, and are now starting to suspect foul play.
>> Stay tuned for more.
>> Our researchers shut down Facebook’s biased left-wing trending news team.
>> They uncovered never-before-heard audio tapes of establishment Trump-hater John McCain broadcasting communist propaganda in Vietnam.
>> Their research was successfully used in court against Rolling Stone magazine in a $7.5 million judgment.
>> Best of all, Politico revealed that President Donald J. Trump reads printed-out GotNews articles in the Oval Office.
>> If you’d like to hire our research team, email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
>> Like our scoops? You won’t hear this stuff from the lying mainstream media. Keep the GotNews mission alive: send tips to email@example.com or donate at FreeStartr.com/GotNews.
>> [The following offer ends November 30, 2018]
>> No More Cell Phone Bills for 9 Years!
>> I’ve bought 2 Cell Phone SIMS from MCS USA so far – fast quality unlimited Cell Phone service!
>> I will have no more Cell Phone Bills for 9 years, saving $50/month x 2 for 9 years.
>> Unlimited Voice and Text, temporary Throttle on Data after 2 GB, no throttling after about 9 months,
>> so Unlimited Data for 8+ Years.
>> I paid $300 up front for each SIM (for my GSM phones) — no more Bills for 9 years.
>> MCS USA is growing fast.
>> Shortly, the price will change to $600 for 5 years, then probably about $15+/month after full launch.
>> $300 PrePaid for 9 Years calculates out to about $2.78/month.
>> Shortly, $600 for 5 years will calculate to $10/month – only offered for a while, then $15+/mo regular price
>> They have new patented technology and market advantages to beat out all the competitors.
>> (The $300 cuts out the middleman – no monthly commissions to agents/brokers.)
>> It’s a initial special to savvy individuals to promote their new service.
>> Jump on it now before it’s gone!
>> (Click Here to go straight to MCS USA to Order Yours)
>> I paid an extra $48 to keep my old phone numbers with my new service.
>> Money Back Guarantee if not satisfied within 9 days of Activation and Use.
>> Free Calls to Mexico and 92 other Countries from the US.
>> If you also want to stop paying an average of $50/month for 9 Years of No Phone Bills,
>> Grab It Now!
>> Details and To Order (Click Here to go straight to MCS USA to Order Yours)
>> Or visit my websites for description at http://www.CheapoMobile.com – spanish/espanol http://www.Celular-Barato.com
>> Also new movie out by D’Souza – Death of a Nation – once a day at select theatres
>> Are we having fun yet???
62 Heartwarming Animal Photos And The Story Behind Them
Uncategorized | October 1, 2018
An Australian green tree frog on top of an African spurred tortoise
Do frogs ride tortoises? No, or at least not habitually. There is the issue of speed — while a tortoise might offer a good surface for the rider, you can’t be in a hurry. You’d get wherever you’re going much faster if you just hopped. And speaking of the concept of “getting wherever you’re going” — there’s no way for a frog to steer a tortoise. This photo, while cute, just makes no sense. When it started showing up on photo-of-the-day/weird-news sites, some journalists called BS, and they were completely right. The frog here is an an Australian green tree frog, and he’s riding a sulcata tortoise, which is native to Africa. The photo was taken in Indonesia — when the photographer was tracked down, he admitted he buys his subjects at a local pet shop, stacks or otherwise poses them for photos, then sells the photos to wire services. Yes, the photo is cute, but it’s a completely manufactured scene — don’t believe everything you see (or read) on the internet, folks.